-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, 25 Dec 2013 13:26:16 +0100 hasufell <hasuf...@gentoo.org> wrote:
> You are interfering with my workflow and I already told you why I kept > the useflag, so stop reverting my commits after I told you the reasons > in a private mail. Interference goes both ways, that's why both of you are reverting; if you mask the USE flag then you can keep the description, it is more preferable than removing the flag from the ebuild (that is even stable). > QA is more than just running repoman and doing random commits on other > peoples ebuilds. (besides that you already managed to break the > Manifest of this stable package last time) QA is that it is written down (as a mask) that the USE flag is broken; removing it just hides its brokenness, it might very well fit in your workflow but if someone else joins maintenance or the package gets maintained by someone else later "out of sight, out of mind" applies. - -- With kind regards, Tom Wijsman (TomWij) Gentoo Developer E-mail address : tom...@gentoo.org GPG Public Key : 6D34E57D GPG Fingerprint : C165 AF18 AB4C 400B C3D2 ABF0 95B2 1FCD 6D34 E57D -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJSutLSAAoJEJWyH81tNOV9C3MIAKH8JzNIHpAXH8esAKe3EtQ5 HFJDHBPxjfBiAN2IB442rqjH3cfFHPI6EBb4ULb2TRIW2kgTyIGsUrmaPtONm9td EYT+kAWlyh9OVRHlJ1jYoB2UTixBrdVaNApiMojJ9Uvn3yukSaDf7mW0rf9jxPv3 +92XjmuqTiPybC2qyp/nl6HNXoQ8TfQd+nLZiQm3AWXBR3hhiHDOUrMUlsdHmGFs qlYMk529NFCGSFENBvooT3xSKUazXe+pjN06TycY9DKk2199dPWOeVYwIAlY1KqW cuWyj/gqCMo7RSku+lkl/OKkn1NsIAvoA+IKBECjpdgD1/kPVdt6iBapDqh6RHI= =E8a/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
