On Sat, 28 Dec 2013 15:44:45 +0000 Markos Chandras <hwoar...@gentoo.org> wrote:
> It certainly isn't to the person who caused the problem
Hard to tell from skimming the context, but in his first mail there is
an acknowledgment that there was previous communication between both
persons; it just appears to be that both of them insist or their view.
> so what I am saying is that maybe it's better first to communicate
> the problem with him before starting a public heated discussion.
Communication is fine; it's been told by repoman, a revert and Patrick.
Solutions like pinging every single person for every small change or
filing a bug for every single line that could involve QA is a good way
to burn out the QA team again or create an useless bug backlog.
What really does need a solution here are that "reverts" have happened;
it should be a rule that an action cannot be done twice without
agreement, to force people to rather constructively discuss it instead.
"'Cause I want it that way..." ~ Backstreet Boys
--
With kind regards,
Tom Wijsman (TomWij)
Gentoo Developer
E-mail address : tom...@gentoo.org
GPG Public Key : 6D34E57D
GPG Fingerprint : C165 AF18 AB4C 400B C3D2 ABF0 95B2 1FCD 6D34 E57D
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
