On 12/28/2013 04:44 PM, Markos Chandras wrote: > On 12/28/2013 03:44 PM, Andreas K. Huettel wrote: >> >>>>> That's what I call "ignoring the rest". You do not communicate, >>>>> you do not file bugs, you just go and do stuff. >>>> >>>> That kind of behaviour is what the QA team is supposed to be able >>>> to address. You should raise this issue with them rather than >>>> accusing each other on the lists. >>> >>> I completely agree with this. I feel that this thread is a sign that >>> there is a problem on how the new QA communicates problems with the >>> developers that cause them. I read the entire thread and I still don't >>> think there is an agreement on who broke the tree and why. Would a >>> private discussion be better before going publicly with accusations? >> >> Introducing repoman warnings deliberately is wrong. Point. >> QA can do trivial fixes. Point. >> >> None of these two points needs any discussion. >> > Certainly, but look at the size and contents of this thread and now tell > me if what you said is clear to everyone. It certainly isn't to the > person who caused the problem so what I am saying is that maybe it's > better first to communicate the problem with him before starting a > public heated discussion. >
If you read the whole thread, you would know that I did communicate privately beforehand. As in 90% of the cases I guess it was still a mistake to post (this) on dev ML. I definitely do not need your help to address this problem, so please don't feed this thread any further.
