On Wed, 25 Dec 2013 18:37:24 +0100
Patrick Lauer <patr...@gentoo.org> wrote:

> On 12/25/2013 01:26 PM, hasufell wrote:
> 
> > You are interfering with my workflow and I already told you why I kept
> > the useflag, so stop reverting my commits after I told you the reasons
> > in a private mail.
> > 
> > QA is more than just running repoman and doing random commits on other
> > peoples ebuilds. (besides that you already managed to break the
> > Manifest of this stable package last time)
> > 
> 
> Soooooooooooo ....
> 
>   25 Dec 2013; Julian Ospald <hasuf...@gentoo.org> metadata.xml:
>   revert pseudo-QA commit
> 
>   25 Dec 2013; Patrick Lauer <patr...@gentoo.org> metadata.xml:
>   Remove unneeded useflag description from metadata.xml
> 
>   23 Dec 2013; Julian Ospald <hasuf...@gentoo.org> metadata.xml:
>   add unused useflag since the breakage is expected to be temporary
> 
> 
> <irker104> AutoRepomanReport for Wed Dec 25 17:22:16 UTC 2013
> <irker104> AutoRepomanWarning: media-sound/umurmur/metadata.xml: unused
> local USE-description: 'polarssl'
> 
> 
> Why the bleeping bleep are you KNOWINGLY introducing a useless
> regression that serves no purpose but to annoy some people, and then add
> a passive-agressive Changelog entry?
> 
> Fix your workflow, man ... and don't cause useless warning spam if you
> can avoid it.

Oh FFS it's a USE flag.  You guys have bigger fish to fry.


-- 
Ryan Hill                        psn: dirtyepic_sk
   gcc-porting/toolchain/wxwidgets @ gentoo.org

47C3 6D62 4864 0E49 8E9E  7F92 ED38 BD49 957A 8463

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to