On Mon, 10 Mar 2025 18:42:49 -0400
Eli Schwartz <eschwa...@gentoo.org> wrote:

> On 3/10/25 4:53 PM, Maciej Barć wrote:
> > Hi!
> >   
> >> Although maybe it should be sci-ml.  
> > 
> > Let's _not_ use *-ml since for us ml stands for OCaml (which comes from
> > ML - "Meta langauge").
> > 
> > sci-ai, dev-ai, and app-ai (say, "app-ai/ollama"?) are nice IMO.  
> 
> 
> - please don't top-post
> 
> - Let's _not_ use *-ai since AI stands for generative artificial
>   intelligence which most of these packages are not, even according to
>   the intended use of the *-ai term in this thread
> 
> I don't understand your argument at all. "ml" is hardly a reserved
> concept, and dev-ml exists precisely for "libraries and utilities
> relevant to the ML programming language", which isn't going to get
> confused with sci-ml/ for the same reason nobody would dream of
> searching in sci-cpp/ for "scientific software written in C++", as the
> emphasis is on *science* and naturally brings the concept of machine
> learning to mind.
> 
> I could argue that "AI" is too confusing of a term to use because it is
> the name of the pale-throated sloth (and because there are other
> abbreviations that are DEEPLY not on topic for this mailing list). But
> fortunately people possess the ability to recognize context, and will
> recognize that Gentoo packages are not talking about members of the
> animal kingdom. They will also recognize sci-machine-learning when they
> see it.
> 
> Or, we could bite the bullet and stop clinging "short and witty two-word
> categories".
> 
> Let's call it "sci-machine-learning/".

How about "sci-learn/"?  Not too long, and too ambiguous.

> But obviously, whatever we call it shouldn't feel like deceptive
> trickery to the people ***using*** the packages from this proposed new
> category. So I oppose anything with the name "ai" in it, as it's way too
> specific, unless it is strictly limited to e.g. ollama, which isn't
> actually packaged in ::gentoo and isn't actually on topic as a result.

Cheers,
Bryan

Attachment: pgpES10Z61zCP.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to