W dniu 10.03.2025 o 23:42, Eli Schwartz pisze:
I don't understand your argument at all. "ml" is hardly a reserved concept, and dev-ml exists precisely for "libraries and utilities relevant to the ML programming language", which isn't going to get confused with sci-ml/ for the same reason nobody would dream of searching in sci-cpp/ for "scientific software written in C++", as the emphasis is on *science* and naturally brings the concept of machine learning to mind.
If I would see the name "sci-cpp" for the 1st time I would indeed think of C++ libs for scientific usage. Not sure what other "CPP" you have meant here. :)
I would say "ml" is kinda indeed reserved. But maybe we could move ocaml pkgs into "dev-ocaml" and then introduce "dev-ml". In case of having "dev-ocaml" and "sci-ml" nobody would get confused.
As I see "dev-ml" all the time I work on ::gentoo, having other "*-ml" feels very confusing to me.
-- Have a great day! ~ Maciej Barć https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/User:Xgqt 9B0A 4C5D 02A3 B43C 9D6F D6B1 14D7 4A1F 43A6 AC3C
OpenPGP_0x14D74A1F43A6AC3C.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
