On Wed, 12 Mar 2025 08:47:42 +0100 Florian Schmaus <f...@gentoo.org> wrote:
> This appears to leave us with sci-ai/* because: > > First, 'AI' seems to be the term that is commonly used (just look at > this mail's subject) and understood. > > Secondly, while others may find sci-ai to buzzwordy, that could also > been seen as an advantage. > > And finally, maybe there will be non-deep-learning packages which we > then could put under sci-ai/*. I would go with sci-ai/* then, as this category could also host non-deep-learning things Alfredo
