On Wed, Mar 12, 2025 at 08:47:42AM +0100, Florian Schmaus wrote: > On 10/03/2025 21.40, Alfredo Tupone wrote: > > To declutter sci-libs and dev-libs from most of the "so called" > > AI packages I think that a new category should be created. > > Maybe sci-ai/ or dev-ai/ or sci-dl/ (deep-learning) > > Thanks for your proposal. > > I would go with sci-ai/*, even if all packages under that category would > be about deep/machine learning. And while sci-ml would maybe more > suitable, -ml seems to be established to indicate OCaml / ML, and we > should avoid naming inconsistencies. For the same reason I would rule > out sci-machine-learning. > > This appears to leave us with sci-ai/* because: > > First, 'AI' seems to be the term that is commonly used (just look at > this mail's subject) and understood. > > Secondly, while others may find sci-ai to buzzwordy, that could also > been seen as an advantage. > > And finally, maybe there will be non-deep-learning packages which we > then could put under sci-ai/*.
From all answers in this thread, this one resonates with me. I prefer sci-ai/* as well. Petr
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
