general  

Messages by Date

• 2010/03/22 Branding Solr+Lucene Steven A Rowe
• 2010/03/22 AC 2010 Draft Blurb Grant Ingersoll
• 2010/03/22 New LuSolr trunk (was: RE: (LUCENE-2297) IndexWriter should let you optionally enable reader pooling) Uwe Schindler
• 2010/03/18 Re: Less drastic ways Chris Hostetter
• 2010/03/18 [ANN] Apache Mahout 0.3 Released Robin Anil
• 2010/03/18 [ANNOUNCE] Apache Mahout 0.3 Released Robin Anil
• 2010/03/17 Re: AC NA 2010 - Lucene Grant Ingersoll
• 2010/03/17 Re: AC NA 2010 - Lucene Noirin Shirley
• 2010/03/17 AC NA 2010 - Lucene Grant Ingersoll
• 2010/03/16 Re: Fwd: Will your project feature at ApacheCon North America 2010? Chris Hostetter
• 2010/03/16 Re: Will your project feature at ApacheCon North America 2010? Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
• 2010/03/16 Re: Will your project feature at ApacheCon North America 2010? Isabel Drost
• 2010/03/16 Re: Less drastic ways Doug Cutting
• 2010/03/16 Re: Will your project feature at ApacheCon North America 2010? Simon Willnauer
• 2010/03/16 Fwd: Will your project feature at ApacheCon North America 2010? Grant Ingersoll
• 2010/03/15 Re: Board Report Due Grant Ingersoll
• 2010/03/15 Re: Less drastic ways Michael McCandless
• 2010/03/14 Re: [VOTE]: release Mahout 0.3 (resend, I forgot [email protected]) Grant Ingersoll
• 2010/03/14 Re: Less drastic ways Otis Gospodnetic
• 2010/03/14 Re: Less drastic ways Michael McCandless
• 2010/03/14 Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Yonik Seeley
• 2010/03/14 Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Otis Gospodnetic
• 2010/03/14 Re: Less drastic ways Otis Gospodnetic
• 2010/03/14 Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Yonik Seeley
• 2010/03/14 Re: Poll: solr-dev/java-dev overlap Otis Gospodnetic
• 2010/03/14 Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Otis Gospodnetic
• 2010/03/14 Re: Less drastic ways Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
• 2010/03/14 Re: Less drastic ways Grant Ingersoll
• 2010/03/14 Re: Less drastic ways Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
• 2010/03/14 Re: Less drastic ways Grant Ingersoll
• 2010/03/14 Re: Less drastic ways Grant Ingersoll
• 2010/03/14 Less drastic ways Otis Gospodnetic
• 2010/03/14 Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Otis Gospodnetic
• 2010/03/14 Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Mark Miller
• 2010/03/14 Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Yonik Seeley
• 2010/03/14 Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Otis Gospodnetic
• 2010/03/14 Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Otis Gospodnetic
• 2010/03/14 Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Otis Gospodnetic
• 2010/03/14 Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Otis Gospodnetic
• 2010/03/14 Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Grant Ingersoll
• 2010/03/14 Re: Board Report Due Grant Ingersoll
• 2010/03/14 Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Michael McCandless
• 2010/03/13 Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
• 2010/03/13 Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Michael Busch
• 2010/03/13 Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) patrick o'leary
• 2010/03/13 Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Mark Miller
• 2010/03/13 Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) patrick o'leary
• 2010/03/13 RE: Board Report Due Digy
• 2010/03/13 Board Report Due Grant Ingersoll
• 2010/03/12 Re: Board Report Due Marvin Humphrey
• 2010/03/12 Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Bernd Fondermann
• 2010/03/12 Re: Umbrella Projects Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
• 2010/03/12 Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Grant Ingersoll
• 2010/03/12 Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) patrick o'leary
• 2010/03/12 Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Grant Ingersoll
• 2010/03/12 Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
• 2010/03/12 Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
• 2010/03/12 Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Grant Ingersoll
• 2010/03/12 Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
• 2010/03/12 Re: Umbrella Projects Grant Ingersoll
• 2010/03/12 Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) patrick o'leary
• 2010/03/12 Re: Umbrella Projects Andrzej Bialecki
• 2010/03/12 Re: Umbrella Projects Grant Ingersoll
• 2010/03/12 Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Dennis Kubes
• 2010/03/12 Umbrella Projects WAS: Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Bernd Fondermann
• 2010/03/12 Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Mark Miller
• 2010/03/12 Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Grant Ingersoll
• 2010/03/12 Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Dennis Kubes
• 2010/03/12 Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Bernd Fondermann
• 2010/03/12 Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Simon Willnauer
• 2010/03/12 Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Mark Miller
• 2010/03/12 Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Dennis Kubes
• 2010/03/12 Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Grant Ingersoll
• 2010/03/12 Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Yonik Seeley
• 2010/03/12 Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Bernd Fondermann
• 2010/03/12 Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Dennis Kubes
• 2010/03/12 Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Simon Willnauer
• 2010/03/12 Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Grant Ingersoll
• 2010/03/12 Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Bernd Fondermann
• 2010/03/11 Re: Problem when the synonym has 2 words Simon Willnauer
• 2010/03/11 Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Simon Willnauer
• 2010/03/11 Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) patrick o'leary
• 2010/03/11 Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
• 2010/03/11 Re: Problem when the synonym has 2 words Robert Muir
• 2010/03/11 Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Yonik Seeley
• 2010/03/11 Re: Problem when the synonym has 2 words Claudio R
• 2010/03/11 Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Ryan McKinley
• 2010/03/11 Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Andi Vajda
• 2010/03/11 Berlin Buzzwords - Call for presentations Simon Willnauer
• 2010/03/10 Re: How to do prefix/phrase matching with term-length-sensitive scoring? Chris Hostetter
• 2010/03/10 Re: Board Report Due Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
• 2010/03/10 Board Report Due Grant Ingersoll
• 2010/03/10 Re: [VOTE] Merge the development of Solr/Lucene (take 2) Erik Hatcher
• 2010/03/10 Re: Poll: solr-dev/java-dev overlap Grant Ingersoll
• 2010/03/10 Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Simon Willnauer
• 2010/03/09 Re: final lucene/solr merge vote is up Noble Paul നോബിള്‍ नोब्ळ्
• 2010/03/09 Re: Poll: solr-dev/java-dev overlap Mike Klaas
• 2010/03/09 Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Mike Klaas
• 2010/03/09 Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Chris Hostetter
• 2010/03/09 Re: [VOTE] Merge the development of Solr/Lucene (take 2) Chris Hostetter
• 2010/03/09 Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) patrick o'leary
• 2010/03/09 Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Grant Ingersoll
• 2010/03/09 Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Jason Rutherglen
• 2010/03/09 Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Otis Gospodnetic
• 2010/03/09 Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Otis Gospodnetic
• 2010/03/09 Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Robert Muir
• 2010/03/09 Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Dennis Kubes
• 2010/03/09 Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Michael McCandless
• 2010/03/09 Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Michael Busch
• 2010/03/09 Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Yonik Seeley
• 2010/03/09 Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
• 2010/03/09 RE: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Granroth, Neal V.
• 2010/03/09 Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Grant Ingersoll
• 2010/03/09 Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Michael Busch
• 2010/03/09 Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Grant Ingersoll
• 2010/03/09 Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
• 2010/03/09 Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Grant Ingersoll
• 2010/03/09 Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
• 2010/03/09 Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Yonik Seeley
• 2010/03/09 RE: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Uwe Schindler
• 2010/03/09 Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Robert Muir
• 2010/03/09 Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
• 2010/03/09 Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Dennis Kubes
• 2010/03/09 Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Grant Ingersoll
• 2010/03/09 Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Grant Ingersoll
• 2010/03/09 Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
• 2010/03/09 Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Yonik Seeley
• 2010/03/09 Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
• 2010/03/09 Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Robert Muir
• 2010/03/09 Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
• 2010/03/09 Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Grant Ingersoll
• 2010/03/09 Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Michael McCandless
• 2010/03/09 Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Yonik Seeley
• 2010/03/09 Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Dennis Kubes
• 2010/03/09 Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Grant Ingersoll
• 2010/03/09 Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development Grant Ingersoll
• 2010/03/09 Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Robert Muir
• 2010/03/09 Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Dennis Kubes
• 2010/03/09 Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Michael McCandless
• 2010/03/09 Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
• 2010/03/09 Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Michael McCandless
• 2010/03/09 Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Andrzej Bialecki
• 2010/03/09 Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Andrzej Bialecki
• 2010/03/09 Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Dennis Kubes
• 2010/03/09 Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
• 2010/03/09 Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Andrzej Bialecki
• 2010/03/09 Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Jukka Zitting
• 2010/03/09 Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) - can we take a pause? Ian Holsman
• 2010/03/09 Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Michael McCandless
• 2010/03/08 Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development Ryan McKinley
• 2010/03/08 Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Shalin Shekhar Mangar
• 2010/03/08 Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Ted Dunning
• 2010/03/08 Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Ted Dunning
• 2010/03/08 Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Dennis Kubes
• 2010/03/08 Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Mark Miller
• 2010/03/08 Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Mark Miller
• 2010/03/08 Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Mark Miller
• 2010/03/08 Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
• 2010/03/08 Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Mark Miller
• 2010/03/08 Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development Yonik Seeley
• 2010/03/08 Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Michael Busch
• 2010/03/08 Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Grant Ingersoll
• 2010/03/08 Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Mark Miller
• 2010/03/08 Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Ian Holsman
• 2010/03/08 Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) patrick o'leary
• 2010/03/08 Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
• 2010/03/08 Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
• 2010/03/08 Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Mark Miller
• 2010/03/08 Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Mark Miller
• 2010/03/08 Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Yonik Seeley
• 2010/03/08 Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
• 2010/03/08 Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Michael Busch
• 2010/03/08 Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Mark Miller
• 2010/03/08 Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
• 2010/03/08 Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Yonik Seeley
• 2010/03/08 Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
• 2010/03/08 Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Mark Miller
• 2010/03/08 [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Yonik Seeley
• 2010/03/08 Re: [VOTE] Merge the development of Solr/Lucene (take 2) Ryan McKinley
• 2010/03/06 Re: Composing posts for both JIRA and email (was a JIRA post) Michael McCandless
• 2010/03/05 Re: [VOTE] Merge the development of Solr/Lucene (take 2) Grant Ingersoll
• 2010/03/05 Re: Composing posts for both JIRA and email (was a JIRA post) Marvin Humphrey
• 2010/03/05 Re: [VOTE] Release PyLucene 2.9.2-1 and 3.0.1-1 (nag) Grant Ingersoll
• 2010/03/05 Re: [VOTE] Release PyLucene 2.9.2-1 and 3.0.1-1 (nag) Grant Ingersoll
• 2010/03/05 Re: [VOTE] Merge the development of Solr/Lucene (take 2) Grant Ingersoll
• 2010/03/05 Board Report Due for Meeting on Wed, 17 March 2010 Grant Ingersoll
• 2010/03/05 Re: Composing posts for both JIRA and email (was a JIRA post) Michael McCandless
• 2010/03/04 Re: [VOTE] Merge the development of Solr/Lucene (take 2) Koji Sekiguchi
• 2010/03/04 Re: Q re merging dev MLs Chris Hostetter
• 2010/03/04 Re: [VOTE] Merge the development of Solr/Lucene (take 2) Chris Hostetter
• 2010/03/04 Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development Doug Cutting
• 2010/03/04 Re: Q re merging dev MLs Doug Cutting
• 2010/03/04 Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
• 2010/03/04 Re: [VOTE] Merge the development of Solr/Lucene (take 2) Michael Busch
• 2010/03/04 Re: [VOTE] Merge the development of Solr/Lucene (take 2) Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
• 2010/03/04 Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development Doug Cutting
• 2010/03/04 Re: Q re merging dev MLs Mark Miller
• 2010/03/04 Re: [VOTE] Merge the development of Solr/Lucene (take 2) Bill Au
• 2010/03/04 Re: [VOTE] Merge the development of Solr/Lucene (take 2) Robert Muir
• 2010/03/04 Re: [VOTE] Release PyLucene 2.9.2-1 and 3.0.1-1 (nag) Andi Vajda

• Later messages