On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 11:54 PM, Chris Hostetter <[email protected]> wrote: > > : from Solr into Lucene don't need to be in there. All of a sudden I'm > agreeing > : with Hoss about goals rather than actual steps ;) Because those points are > not > : important to this vote at all - they are more examples of what we will be > able > ... > : This is about merging dev so we can put code where it belongs and do things > : that can make sense - its not a vote where specific code refactorings matter > > This is the point where i say... > > AHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!! HA HA HA HA HAAAAAAA!!!!! > > HA! > > I've had relationships (with live people that i cared deeply about) that > recieved less of my attention this all of this, and i just don't give a > fuck anymore. > > I'm -1 to "the proposal" on the grounds that 150+ messages into the > discusison, it still seems like no one has any fucking clue what it is > we're voting on.
Thanks Chris for pointing this out! I'm somewhat lost and I can not keep up with the amount of email regarding this "vote". IMO if we vote on something a reply should be +1, -1 or +-0. If you want to discuss, vote -1. simon > > If anyone has any patches, releases, or a potential committers they'd like > me to vote on please let me know -- otherwise i'm wiping my hands of the > whole thing. I'm done with this thread, and i don't plan on reading any > more messages posted to it. (one of the bueatiful things about Lucene: > the community (and the PMC) are large enough that the wheels will keep > turning and smart people will make smart choices even if close my eyes and > stick my fingers in my ears) > > if you'll excuse me: i desperately need to go review some patches, and > answer some questions on the user lists so i can ultimately finish this > day with some sense of accomplishment. > > > -Hoss > >
