On 3/8/10 9:26 PM, "Mark Miller" <[email protected]> wrote:
> Also, we have decided on no code restructurings - the hope is to allow > them (and in the past you have championed some of the ones we hope to > see), but there are no restructurings that are part of the vote. Ummm, that's not true. Mike's last proposal listed these points: * When any change is committed (to a module that "belongs to" Solr or to Lucene), all tests must pass. * Modulariize the sources: pull things out of Lucene's core (break out query parser, move all core queries & analyzers under their contrib counterparts), pull things out of Solr's core (analyzers, queries). If those don't have to do with code changes, then I'm not sure what they are and would appreciate clarification. Cheers, Chris ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Chris Mattmann, Ph.D. Senior Computer Scientist NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA Office: 171-266B, Mailstop: 171-246 Email: [email protected] WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/ ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Adjunct Assistant Professor, Computer Science Department University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
