Sigh... http://www.surveymonkey.com/
On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 2:00 PM, Grant Ingersoll <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Mar 9, 2010, at 12:38 PM, Otis Gospodnetic wrote: > > > > > > > * I think Grant may be right. We don't need this discussion. Because > the Solr/Lucene developer overlap is excellent, why not just start moving > selected Solr code to new Lucene modules, just like Mike proposed we move > Analysis from Lucene core to a new Lucene module? > > Note, if you read what I said again you will realize I wasn't actually > proposing this. I was saying actually, that I think it would not be > something that people really wanted, even though it is perfectly "legal", > just like poaching is perfectly "legal", but isn't, in my mind a good > solution. Sigh. The problem with email, I guess, especially on long > threads.
