Hi Justin, Thank you for the continued feedback. I will bring this back to the PPMC to re-discuss the roster and propose a more concise list that strictly reflects incubation-era contributions and governance. Will report back once we have an updated proposal.
Best regards, Jark On Sat, 13 Jun 2026 at 19:32, Justin Mclean <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi, > > Thanks for the detailed follow-up, and for restarting the discussion against > the agreed criteria. > > For most proposed members, the evidence clearly meets the test you adopted: > commits, reviews, release management, compliance, and governance during > incubation. > > For at least one, possibly two, though, the cited contributions are > pre-donation founding work. That work is real and valued, but under your own > criteria, it is pre-donation history and promotion, not incubation-era > contribution or governance. > > As noted earlier, "merit never expires" applies to existing committers and > PMC members; it isn't a basis for a seat on a new graduation PMC. Nor should > a person's title or position in a company be a factor, which appears to be > part of the rationale here. > > Kind Regards, > Justin > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
