Hi, Thanks for the detailed update. The community has clearly put significant effort into addressing the feedback.
I do still have the same concern. The revised process correctly adopted a nomination-with-evidence standard, which is good to see. However, I'd ask the community to confirm that all proposed PMC members have been evaluated against the agreed criteria, and in particular that the contributions being relied on occurred during the incubation period rather than prior to the ASF donation. Looking at the proposed roster, I don't believe this has been done for everyone, and the initial issue that concerned me has not been fully addressed. Kind Regards, Justin
