https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117878
--- Comment #4 from Li Pan <pan2.li at intel dot com> --- (In reply to Robin Dapp from comment #3) > Generally, yes, I guess. But I'd like to understand better what exactly is > going wrong. Shouldn't emitting those "pre-RA" insns already be guarded > properly? I haven't looked into it in detail - isn't there a way to not > create the wrong insn in the first place? I see, I will have a try for this.
