https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117878
--- Comment #3 from Robin Dapp <rdapp at gcc dot gnu.org> --- Generally, yes, I guess. But I'd like to understand better what exactly is going wrong. Shouldn't emitting those "pre-RA" insns already be guarded properly? I haven't looked into it in detail - isn't there a way to not create the wrong insn in the first place?
