Omer Frenkel has posted comments on this change.

Change subject: engine: Introducing a queue for failovers event
......................................................................


Patch Set 1: (1 inline comment)

what about calls to reconstruct (and other relevant commands) not from the 
event listener? means from the bll commands?
shouldn't use the 'events' as well?

....................................................
Commit Message
Line 12: The appropriate event should be submitted to queue and will be 
executed accorrding to
Line 13: internal logic of queue.
Line 14: Because of execution of events is done in separate thread no deadlock 
should occurred, also
Line 15: no need for excplicit additional locking
Line 16: These is a first patch it will introduce a queue and all stuff should 
work as before, but
i guess it should be 'This'
Line 17: using of queue with small change will allow: to reject unneeded events 
when some othe event is running,
Line 18: ensure order, ensure appropriate release of quartz threads, fix a races
Line 19: 
Line 20: Change-Id: Ic1224feacdcdaaaf0b59d26105805ba7ef2a2fff


--
To view, visit http://gerrit.ovirt.org/9838
To unsubscribe, visit http://gerrit.ovirt.org/settings

Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Gerrit-Change-Id: Ic1224feacdcdaaaf0b59d26105805ba7ef2a2fff
Gerrit-PatchSet: 1
Gerrit-Project: ovirt-engine
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Owner: Michael Kublin <mkub...@redhat.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Barak Azulay <bazu...@redhat.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Eli Mesika <emes...@redhat.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Michael Kublin <mkub...@redhat.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Moti Asayag <masa...@redhat.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Omer Frenkel <ofren...@redhat.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Ravi Nori <rn...@redhat.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Roy Golan <rgo...@redhat.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Yair Zaslavsky <yzasl...@redhat.com>
_______________________________________________
Engine-patches mailing list
Engine-patches@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/engine-patches

Reply via email to