On Fri, 24 Jul 2020 at 00:03, Ville Voutilainen <ville.voutilai...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Thu, 23 Jul 2020 at 23:59, Thiago Macieira <thiago.macie...@intel.com> > wrote: > > > > On Thursday, 23 July 2020 12:34:06 PDT Simon Hausmann wrote: > > > I think the primary environment where a transition and resulting BC > > > breakage would be annoying is the Linux system environment with gcc. This > > > is where Olivier’s solution is quite elegant IMO. > > > > I'd rather go to [[no_unique_address]] instead of this. The extension > > doesn't > > compile in all cases (you can't have a Flexible Array Member everywhere) and > > is going to produce warnings. > > > > Let's just drop GCC 8. > > Does that also drop QNX?
It'll also drop mingw for now, unless we start using https://nuwen.net/mingw.html, which is 64-bit only. _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
