On Thu, 23 Jul 2020 at 23:59, Thiago Macieira <thiago.macie...@intel.com> wrote: > > On Thursday, 23 July 2020 12:34:06 PDT Simon Hausmann wrote: > > I think the primary environment where a transition and resulting BC > > breakage would be annoying is the Linux system environment with gcc. This > > is where Olivier’s solution is quite elegant IMO. > > I'd rather go to [[no_unique_address]] instead of this. The extension doesn't > compile in all cases (you can't have a Flexible Array Member everywhere) and > is going to produce warnings. > > Let's just drop GCC 8.
Does that also drop QNX? _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
