On Fri, 24 Jul 2020 at 18:10, Thiago Macieira <thiago.macie...@intel.com> wrote:
> Can I suggest that we prepare at least two papers for the standard? One for > the member-to-containing-object trick and the second for what QProperty really > is: sub-scope of a class. We don't want a different this pointer, we just want > to scope. The member-to-containing-object seems like it might just be a fix to what P1839 says. I don't know what the "sub-scope of a class" means. _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
