On 2020-07-23 23:09, Ville Voutilainen wrote:
On Fri, 24 Jul 2020 at 00:03, Ville Voutilainen
<ville.voutilai...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thu, 23 Jul 2020 at 23:59, Thiago Macieira <thiago.macie...@intel.com> wrote:
On Thursday, 23 July 2020 12:34:06 PDT Simon Hausmann wrote:
I think the primary environment where a transition and resulting BC
breakage would be annoying is the Linux system environment with gcc. This
is where Olivier’s solution is quite elegant IMO.
I'd rather go to [[no_unique_address]] instead of this. The extension doesn't
compile in all cases (you can't have a Flexible Array Member everywhere) and
is going to produce warnings.
Let's just drop GCC 8.
Does that also drop QNX?
It'll also drop mingw for now, unless we start using
https://nuwen.net/mingw.html, which
is 64-bit only.
If you're thinking of mingw on Windows, then there's an other
alternative msys2 https://www.msys2.org/
it has gcc 10.1.0 (and it also has fresh downloads of 32-bits and
64-bits Qt Creator 4.12.4 built with 5.15.0 gcc 10.1.0).
_______________________________________________
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
