Il 17/07/20 11:05, Lars Knoll ha scritto:
No, we should just static_assert for [[no_unique_address]] being available on the platforms where we expect it. That is, anywhere but on certain MSVCs.Some older embedded toolchains don’t have the flag neither.If we make it a configure feature, we open the door to BIC problems as we might accidentally turn it off in some builds.We should simply add a static assert that the Qt and the applications build mode are compatible.
But what would be the advantage of switching from the union to the attribute? Saving 1 byte per class?
Thanks, -- Giuseppe D'Angelo | giuseppe.dang...@kdab.com | Senior Software Engineer KDAB (France) S.A.S., a KDAB Group company Tel. France +33 (0)4 90 84 08 53, http://www.kdab.com KDAB - The Qt, C++ and OpenGL Experts
smime.p7s
Description: Firma crittografica S/MIME
_______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
