I've been giving this a lot of thought, and I've come to the conclusion
that this is not a valid vote.
There is no technical justification for throwing away trunk, nor was
there a justification in Remy's veto.
I'm happy to pull out whatever Remy is vetoing, when I know exactly what
is being vetoed.
I proposed in [EMAIL PROTECTED] that we should vote on the Comet impl, and
put that in trunk.
I two or three times asked for a technical justification for this vote,
but one was never given.
In order to not give up the ASF ways, I believe we should be focused on
technical issues, this vote was thrown out there to end an argument, and
that is not a technical justification.
Kudos to Bill for wanting to get to a resolution, but this can't be it.
I'm aware that this will probably cause more heat in an already heated
debate.
Filip
Bill Barker wrote:
I'm so tired of this thread, so let's settle it once and for all. I'm
backing Remy's suggestion to send the current trunk to the sandbox:
[ ] +1 Let's end the revolution
[ ] +0 What revolution?
[ ] -1 Viva the revolultion
My vote is +1.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
