Tibor says "flush" was slow so I assume flush should finish in calculating the effective MB/s. Unsure if he did that...
K 2015-01-10 22:03 GMT+01:00 Igor Fedorenko <i...@ifedorenko.com>: > Out of curiosity, what hardware did you use? 400MB/s seems too high > even for many modern SSDs [1], let alone mechanical hard drives. > > [1] http://techreport.com/review/25391/wd-red-4tb-hard-drive-reviewed/4 > > -- > Regards, > Igor > > On 2015-01-10 13:55, Tibor Digana wrote: >> >> Hi Kristian, >> Are you using NIO for writing big chunks? >> Several years ago I made NIO1 measurements. I found that using 256KB >> DirectByteBuffe on Win together with MappedByteBuffer/RandomAccessFile on >> very large files 1GB got terribly fast throughput 400MB/s on ordinal hard >> drive however the flush/close operation was obviously slow. So this DMA on >> mapped memory really gains the performance. >> >> >> >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://maven.40175.n5.nabble.com/Preview-release-Plexus-Archiver-multithreaded-Zip-edition-tp5822942p5823032.html >> Sent from the Maven Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
