400MB/s is way faster than any single spinning disk can do and actually quite a bit faster than SATA I/II max speeds [1]. This suggests the data was written to the operating system caches but never made it to the disk physical media. That is, unless you had a RAID connected to system using some sort of fast interface. This is why I asked what hardware configuration you had.
[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Serial_ATA -- Regards, Igor On 2015-01-12 4:42, tibor17 wrote:
Kristian, we tested only spinning media. I think this test was done in 2010 or 2011. We did not have SSD that time. In build system I would still rather rely on spinning media. Yes, right, constructing ButeBuffer every time is just bad idea. Since they are not thread-safe, they should be stored in ThreadLocal copy for certainly small thread pool. I didn't measure the time spent on flushing ByteBuffer with 256KB byte array, might be interesting too. ----- BR, tibor17 -- View this message in context: http://maven.40175.n5.nabble.com/Preview-release-Plexus-Archiver-multithreaded-Zip-edition-tp5822942p5823241.html Sent from the Maven Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
