dev  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: [DISCUSS] Publish Builds, not Snapshots Robert Houghton
• Dangers of using sockets in unit tests Kirk Lund
  • Re: Dangers of using sockets in unit tests Bruce Schuchardt
  • Re: Dangers of using sockets in unit tests Kirk Lund
  • Re: Dangers of using sockets in unit tests Kirk Lund
  • Re: Dangers of using sockets in unit tests Kirk Lund
• [DISCUSS] should we add some Windows PR checks? Owen Nichols
  • Re: [DISCUSS] should we add some Windows PR checks? Donal Evans
  • Re: [DISCUSS] should we add some Windows PR checks? Robert Houghton
  • Re: [DISCUSS] should we add some Windows PR checks? Owen Nichols
  • Re: [DISCUSS] should we add some Windows PR checks? Jacob Barrett
• Proposal to include fix for GEODE-8020 in support/1.12 Bruce Schuchardt
  • Re: Proposal to include fix for GEODE-8020 in support/1.12 Owen Nichols
  • Re: Proposal to include fix for GEODE-8020 in support/1.12 Bruce Schuchardt
  • Re: Proposal to include fix for GEODE-8020 in support/1.12 Kirk Lund
  • Re: Proposal to include fix for GEODE-8020 in support/1.12 Anthony Baker
• Passed: apache/geode-examples#444 (support/1.12 - 3ea60ea) Travis CI
• [DISCUSS] Geode 1.13 support branch planning Dave Barnes
• Proposal to restore Pulse logging in support/1.12 Dale Emery
  • Re: Proposal to restore Pulse logging in support/1.12 Anthony Baker
  • Re: Proposal to restore Pulse logging in support/1.12 Jinmei Liao
  • Re: Proposal to restore Pulse logging in support/1.12 Owen Nichols
  • Re: Proposal to restore Pulse logging in support/1.12 Mark Bretl
  • Re: Proposal to restore Pulse logging in support/1.12 Dale Emery
• Re: [VOTE] Using Github issues and wiki for geode-kafka-connector project Anthony Baker
  • Re: [VOTE] Using Github issues and wiki for geode-kafka-connector project Blake Bender
  • Re: [VOTE] Using Github issues and wiki for geode-kafka-connector project Anthony Baker
  • Re: [VOTE] Using Github issues and wiki for geode-kafka-connector project Jacob Barrett
  • Re: [VOTE] Using Github issues and wiki for geode-kafka-connector project Nabarun Nag
  • Re: [VOTE] Using Github issues and wiki for geode-kafka-connector project Blake Bender
  • Re: [VOTE] Using Github issues and wiki for geode-kafka-connector project Dave Barnes
  • Re: [VOTE] Using Github issues and wiki for geode-kafka-connector project Robert Houghton
  • Re: [VOTE] Using Github issues and wiki for geode-kafka-connector project Jacob Barrett
• Switching default branch in .net core repo Blake Bender
  • Re: Switching default branch in .net core repo Anthony Baker
  • Re: Switching default branch in .net core repo Dan Smith
  • Re: Switching default branch in .net core repo Karen Miller
  • Re: Switching default branch in .net core repo Dave Barnes
  • Re: Switching default branch in .net core repo Mark Bretl
• [DISCUSS] preparing for Geode 1.13.0 release Owen Nichols
  • Re: [DISCUSS] preparing for Geode 1.13.0 release Dave Barnes
  • Re: [DISCUSS] preparing for Geode 1.13.0 release Owen Nichols
  • Re: [DISCUSS] preparing for Geode 1.13.0 release Mark Bretl
• Fixed: apache/geode-examples#439 (develop - cc644fa) Travis CI
• [GitHub] [geode] prettyClouds opened a new pull request #4984: Refactor: Split SetsIntegrationTest into multiple files GitBox
• [GitHub] [geode] jdeppe-pivotal commented on issue #4861: GEODE-7905: RedisDistDUnitTest failing intermittently in CI GitBox
• [GitHub] [geode] dschneider-pivotal opened a new pull request #4983: GEODE-8010: message is now debug instead of info GitBox
• [GitHub] [geode] mhansonp opened a new pull request #4982: GEODE-7935: Awaiting for verification steps. GitBox
• [GitHub] [geode] dschneider-pivotal opened a new pull request #4981: GEODE-7981: Redis default should be PARTITION_REDUNDANT GitBox
• [GitHub] [geode] DonalEvans commented on issue #4909: GEODE-7953: Restore Redundancy Internal API GitBox
• [GitHub] [geode] DonalEvans commented on a change in pull request #4909: GEODE-7953: Restore Redundancy Internal API GitBox
• [GitHub] [geode] gesterzhou commented on a change in pull request #4970: GEODE-7676: Add PR clear with expiration tests GitBox
• [GitHub] [geode] upthewaterspout commented on issue #4963: GEODE-7503: Block Cache.close() until everything is disconnected GitBox
• [GitHub] [geode] kirklund removed a comment on issue #4924: DRAFT: GEODE-7964: Upgrade Mockito to 3.3.3 GitBox
  • [GitHub] [geode] kirklund removed a comment on issue #4924: DRAFT: GEODE-7964: Upgrade Mockito to 3.3.3 GitBox
  • [GitHub] [geode] kirklund removed a comment on issue #4924: DRAFT: GEODE-7964: Upgrade Mockito to 3.3.3 GitBox
• [GitHub] [geode] BenjaminPerryRoss commented on a change in pull request #4818: GEODE-7667: Add a 'clear' gfsh command for PR and RR clear GitBox
  • [GitHub] [geode] BenjaminPerryRoss commented on a change in pull request #4818: GEODE-7667: Add a 'clear' gfsh command for PR and RR clear GitBox
  • [GitHub] [geode] BenjaminPerryRoss commented on a change in pull request #4818: GEODE-7667: Add a 'clear' gfsh command for PR and RR clear GitBox
  • [GitHub] [geode] BenjaminPerryRoss commented on a change in pull request #4818: GEODE-7667: Add a 'clear' gfsh command for PR and RR clear GitBox
  • [GitHub] [geode] BenjaminPerryRoss commented on a change in pull request #4818: GEODE-7667: Add a 'clear' gfsh command for PR and RR clear GitBox
  • [GitHub] [geode] BenjaminPerryRoss commented on a change in pull request #4818: GEODE-7667: Add a 'clear' gfsh command for PR and RR clear GitBox
  • [GitHub] [geode] BenjaminPerryRoss commented on a change in pull request #4818: GEODE-7667: Add a 'clear' gfsh command for PR and RR clear GitBox
  • [GitHub] [geode] BenjaminPerryRoss commented on a change in pull request #4818: GEODE-7667: Add a 'clear' gfsh command for PR and RR clear GitBox
  • [GitHub] [geode] BenjaminPerryRoss commented on a change in pull request #4818: GEODE-7667: Add a 'clear' gfsh command for PR and RR clear GitBox
  • [GitHub] [geode] BenjaminPerryRoss commented on a change in pull request #4818: GEODE-7667: Add a 'clear' gfsh command for PR and RR clear GitBox
  • [GitHub] [geode] BenjaminPerryRoss commented on a change in pull request #4818: GEODE-7667: Add a 'clear' gfsh command for PR and RR clear GitBox
  • [GitHub] [geode] BenjaminPerryRoss commented on a change in pull request #4818: GEODE-7667: Add a 'clear' gfsh command for PR and RR clear GitBox
  • [GitHub] [geode] BenjaminPerryRoss commented on a change in pull request #4818: GEODE-7667: Add a 'clear' gfsh command for PR and RR clear GitBox
• [GitHub] [geode] pivotal-jbarrett commented on a change in pull request #4909: GEODE-7953: Restore Redundancy Internal API GitBox
  • [GitHub] [geode] pivotal-jbarrett commented on a change in pull request #4909: GEODE-7953: Restore Redundancy Internal API GitBox
• [GitHub] [geode] DonalEvans commented on a change in pull request #4818: GEODE-7667: Add a 'clear' gfsh command for PR and RR clear GitBox
• [GitHub] [geode] Bill commented on a change in pull request #4959: GEODE-7852: Create test for running cache operations with a dropped … GitBox
  • [GitHub] [geode] Bill commented on a change in pull request #4959: GEODE-7852: Create test for running cache operations with a dropped … GitBox
  • [GitHub] [geode] Bill commented on a change in pull request #4959: GEODE-7852: Create test for running cache operations with a dropped … GitBox
  • [GitHub] [geode] Bill commented on a change in pull request #4959: GEODE-7852: Create test for running cache operations with a dropped … GitBox
• [GitHub] [geode] bschuchardt commented on a change in pull request #4959: GEODE-7852: Create test for running cache operations with a dropped … GitBox
• [GitHub] [geode] upthewaterspout commented on a change in pull request #4909: GEODE-7953: Restore Redundancy Internal API GitBox
• [GitHub] [geode] upthewaterspout commented on issue #4949: GEODE-7982: Close the client first in rolling upgrade test GitBox
• [GitHub] [geode-examples] metatype opened a new pull request #94: GEODE-8006 Added .asf.yaml to control notifications GitBox
• [GitHub] [geode] kirklund commented on issue #4924: DRAFT: GEODE-7964: Upgrade Mockito to 3.3.3 GitBox
• [GitHub] [geode] mhansonp opened a new pull request #4980: GEODE-7935: Awaiting for verification steps. GitBox
• [GitHub] [geode-examples] metatype opened a new pull request #93: GEODE-8006: testing notifications GitBox
  • [GitHub] [geode-examples] metatype commented on issue #93: GEODE-8006: testing notifications GitBox
  • [GitHub] [geode-examples] metatype commented on issue #93: GEODE-8006: testing notifications GitBox
• Broken: apache/geode-examples#434 (develop - 28f5801) Travis CI
• Reconfiguring our notifications and more Anthony Baker
  • Re: Reconfiguring our notifications and more Robert Houghton
  • Re: Reconfiguring our notifications and more Patrick Johnson
  • Re: Reconfiguring our notifications and more Owen Nichols
  • Re: Reconfiguring our notifications and more Dan Smith
  • Re: Reconfiguring our notifications and more Ju@N
  • Re: Reconfiguring our notifications and more Jacob Barrett
  • Re: Reconfiguring our notifications and more Mark Bretl
  • Re: Reconfiguring our notifications and more Mario Kevo
  • Re: Reconfiguring our notifications and more Kirk Lund
  • Re: Reconfiguring our notifications and more Joris Melchior
  • Re: Reconfiguring our notifications and more Dave Barnes
  • Re: Reconfiguring our notifications and more Jianxia Chen
  • Re: Reconfiguring our notifications and more Anthony Baker
• [GitHub] [geode] jujoramos opened a new pull request #4979: [DO NOT REVIEW]: GEM-2885 GitBox
• [GitHub] [geode] alb3rtobr opened a new pull request #4978: Fix for regression introduced by GEODE-7565 GitBox
  • [GitHub] [geode] jujoramos commented on issue #4978: Fix for regression introduced by GEODE-7565 GitBox
  • [GitHub] [geode] jujoramos commented on a change in pull request #4978: Fix for regression introduced by GEODE-7565 GitBox
  • [GitHub] [geode] jujoramos commented on issue #4978: Fix for regression introduced by GEODE-7565 GitBox
  • [GitHub] [geode] alb3rtobr commented on issue #4978: Fix for regression introduced by GEODE-7565 GitBox
• [GitHub] [geode] jujoramos commented on a change in pull request #4970: GEODE-7676: Add PR clear with expiration tests GitBox
  • [GitHub] [geode] jujoramos commented on a change in pull request #4970: GEODE-7676: Add PR clear with expiration tests GitBox
  • [GitHub] [geode] jujoramos commented on a change in pull request #4970: GEODE-7676: Add PR clear with expiration tests GitBox
  • [GitHub] [geode] jujoramos commented on a change in pull request #4970: GEODE-7676: Add PR clear with expiration tests GitBox
  • [GitHub] [geode] jujoramos commented on a change in pull request #4970: GEODE-7676: Add PR clear with expiration tests GitBox
  • [GitHub] [geode] jujoramos commented on a change in pull request #4970: GEODE-7676: Add PR clear with expiration tests GitBox
  • [GitHub] [geode] jujoramos commented on a change in pull request #4970: GEODE-7676: Add PR clear with expiration tests GitBox
• [GitHub] [geode] albertogpz commented on a change in pull request #4928: GEODE-7971: Gw sender deliver TX events atomically to Gw receivers GitBox
  • [GitHub] [geode] albertogpz commented on a change in pull request #4928: GEODE-7971: Gw sender deliver TX events atomically to Gw receivers GitBox
• [GitHub] [geode] albertogpz commented on issue #4928: GEODE-7971: Gw sender deliver TX events atomically to Gw receivers GitBox
• [GitHub] [geode] demery-pivotal opened a new pull request #4977: GEODE-7851: Pulse refreshes expired access tokens GitBox
• [GitHub] [geode] jchen21 commented on a change in pull request #4970: GEODE-7676: Add PR clear with expiration tests GitBox
• [GitHub] [geode] prettyClouds commented on a change in pull request #4973: improvement/GEODE-8002 Refactor: Extract class to encapsulate concurrent execution GitBox
  • [GitHub] [geode] prettyClouds commented on a change in pull request #4973: improvement/GEODE-8002 Refactor: Extract class to encapsulate concurrent execution GitBox
• [GitHub] [geode] DonalEvans commented on a change in pull request #4970: GEODE-7676: Add PR clear with expiration tests GitBox
• [GitHub] [geode] karensmolermiller opened a new pull request #4976: GEODE-7997: Document needed location of parallel gateway sender disk … GitBox
  • [GitHub] [geode] nabarunnag commented on a change in pull request #4976: GEODE-7997: Document needed location of parallel gateway sender disk … GitBox
  • [GitHub] [geode] nabarunnag commented on a change in pull request #4976: GEODE-7997: Document needed location of parallel gateway sender disk … GitBox
• [GitHub] [geode] dschneider-pivotal commented on a change in pull request #4973: improvement/GEODE-8002 Refactor: Extract class to encapsulate concurrent execution GitBox
  • [GitHub] [geode] dschneider-pivotal commented on a change in pull request #4973: improvement/GEODE-8002 Refactor: Extract class to encapsulate concurrent execution GitBox
• [GitHub] [geode] jhuynh1 commented on a change in pull request #4928: GEODE-7971: Gw sender deliver TX events atomically to Gw receivers GitBox
• Reviews needed on Restore Redundancy PR Donal Evans
• [GitHub] [geode] pivotal-jbarrett commented on issue #4969: GEODE-7995: Creates concurrencyTest facet GitBox
• RE: About "change loglevel" command Alberto Bustamante Reyes
• [GitHub] [geode] alb3rtobr opened a new pull request #4975: Logging documentation fixes GitBox
  • [GitHub] [geode] davebarnes97 commented on issue #4975: Logging documentation fixes GitBox
• [GitHub] [geode] kirklund commented on issue #4969: GEODE-7995: Creates concurrencyTest facet GitBox
• GitHub notifications? Anthony Baker
  • Re: GitHub notifications? Nicholas Vallely
  • Re: GitHub notifications? Anthony Baker
• [GitHub] [geode] jujoramos opened a new pull request #4974: Revert "GEODE-7565: Allow gateway receivers with same host and port GitBox
  • [GitHub] [geode] jujoramos commented on issue #4974: Revert "GEODE-7565: Allow gateway receivers with same host and port GitBox
  • [GitHub] [geode] jujoramos edited a comment on issue #4974: Revert "GEODE-7565: Allow gateway receivers with same host and port GitBox
  • [GitHub] [geode] jujoramos edited a comment on issue #4974: Revert "GEODE-7565: Allow gateway receivers with same host and port GitBox
  • [GitHub] [geode] jujoramos edited a comment on issue #4974: Revert "GEODE-7565: Allow gateway receivers with same host and port GitBox
  • [GitHub] [geode] bschuchardt commented on issue #4974: Revert "GEODE-7565: Allow gateway receivers with same host and port GitBox
• [GitHub] [geode] jvarenina commented on a change in pull request #4967: GEODE-7989: Improve backup exceptions logging GitBox
• [GitHub] [geode] mkevo commented on a change in pull request #4967: GEODE-7989: Improve backup exceptions logging GitBox
• Checking for a member is still part of distributed system Anilkumar Gingade
  • Re: Checking for a member is still part of distributed system Kirk Lund
  • Re: Checking for a member is still part of distributed system Anilkumar Gingade
  • Re: Checking for a member is still part of distributed system Anilkumar Gingade
  • Re: Checking for a member is still part of distributed system Bruce Schuchardt
• IntelliJ Plugin Assertions2AssertJ Kirk Lund
• [PROPOSAL]: GEODE-7940 to support/1.12 Ju@N
  • Re: [PROPOSAL]: GEODE-7940 to support/1.12 Owen Nichols
  • Re: [PROPOSAL]: GEODE-7940 to support/1.12 Ju@N
  • Re: [PROPOSAL]: GEODE-7940 to support/1.12 Udo Kohlmeyer
  • Re: [PROPOSAL]: GEODE-7940 to support/1.12 Joris Melchior
  • Re: [PROPOSAL]: GEODE-7940 to support/1.12 Robert Houghton
  • Re: [PROPOSAL]: GEODE-7940 to support/1.12 Owen Nichols
  • Re: [PROPOSAL]: GEODE-7940 to support/1.12 Ju@N
• Concurrent tests hitting OOME, hangs, etc Kirk Lund
  • Re: Concurrent tests hitting OOME, hangs, etc Jacob Barrett
  • Re: Concurrent tests hitting OOME, hangs, etc Dan Smith
  • Re: Concurrent tests hitting OOME, hangs, etc Kirk Lund
• About Geode rolling downgrade Alberto Gomez
  • Re: About Geode rolling downgrade Bruce Schuchardt
  • Re: About Geode rolling downgrade Alberto Gomez
  • Re: About Geode rolling downgrade Bruce Schuchardt
  • Re: About Geode rolling downgrade alberto.gomez
  • Re: About Geode rolling downgrade Dan Smith
  • Re: About Geode rolling downgrade Anilkumar Gingade
  • Re: About Geode rolling downgrade Anthony Baker
  • Re: About Geode rolling downgrade Anilkumar Gingade
  • Re: About Geode rolling downgrade Alberto Gomez
  • Re: About Geode rolling downgrade Alberto Gomez
  • Odg: About Geode rolling downgrade Mario Ivanac
  • Re: About Geode rolling downgrade Nabarun Nag
  • Re: About Geode rolling downgrade Alberto Gomez
• Re: Reviewers for GEODE-7971 Gateway sender to deliver transaction events atomically to gateway receivers Alberto Gomez
  • Re: Reviewers for GEODE-7971 Gateway sender to deliver transaction events atomically to gateway receivers Alberto Gomez
• Re: Data ingestion with predefined buckets steve mathew
  • Re: Data ingestion with predefined buckets Anilkumar Gingade
  • Re: Data ingestion with predefined buckets steve mathew
  • Re: Data ingestion with predefined buckets Anilkumar Gingade
  • Re: Data ingestion with predefined buckets Anthony Baker
• Re: [Discuss] Cache.close synchronous is not synchronous, but code still expects it to be.... Anthony Baker
  • Re: [Discuss] Cache.close synchronous is not synchronous, but code still expects it to be.... Bruce Schuchardt
  • Re: [Discuss] Cache.close synchronous is not synchronous, but code still expects it to be.... Kirk Lund
  • Re: [Discuss] Cache.close synchronous is not synchronous, but code still expects it to be.... Robert Houghton
  • Re: [Discuss] Cache.close synchronous is not synchronous, but code still expects it to be.... Owen Nichols
  • Re: [Discuss] Cache.close synchronous is not synchronous, but code still expects it to be.... Kirk Lund
  • Re: [Discuss] Cache.close synchronous is not synchronous, but code still expects it to be.... Kirk Lund
  • Re: [Discuss] Cache.close synchronous is not synchronous, but code still expects it to be.... Kirk Lund
  • Re: [Discuss] Cache.close synchronous is not synchronous, but code still expects it to be.... Kirk Lund
  • Re: [Discuss] Cache.close synchronous is not synchronous, but code still expects it to be.... Kirk Lund
• Unable to get behavior described in documentation when using durable native client Jakov Varenina
  • Re: Unable to get behavior described in documentation when using durable native client Jacob Barrett
  • Re: Unable to get behavior described in documentation when using durable native client Jakov Varenina
  • Re: Unable to get behavior described in documentation when using durable native client Jacob Barrett
  • Re: Unable to get behavior described in documentation when using durable native client Jacob Barrett
  • Re: Unable to get behavior described in documentation when using durable native client Jakov Varenina
  • Re: Unable to get behavior described in documentation when using durable native client Jakov Varenina

• Later messages