+1 While I’d rather see us go all the way back to 4.0.6, this seems like a step in that direction.
> On May 21, 2020, at 8:30 AM, Anthony Baker <bak...@vmware.com> wrote: > > +1 thanks Juan > >> On May 21, 2020, at 8:12 AM, Ju@N <jujora...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Hello devs, >> >> I'd like to propose bringing *GEODE-8150 [1] *to the *support/1.13* branch. >> The ticket is basically to revert the upgrade of the *classgraph* [2] >> library, we found some performance issues that are not addressed even when >> using the latest released version, the full details can be seen in the >> ticket. >> The fix has been merged into develop through commit >> 07bf3dd827f29a5deb8619f79203d94847a1a823 [3]. >> Best regards. >> >> [1]: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-8150 >> [2]: >> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fclassgraph%2Fclassgraph&data=02%7C01%7Cbakera%40vmware.com%7Cba2b7654573e4e0e88a808d7fd996183%7Cb39138ca3cee4b4aa4d6cd83d9dd62f0%7C0%7C0%7C637256707519827330&sdata=r0KXJRo2QV%2Bj2ifWk%2B4DhuSHhI0O2AFPKRcP2nNVsfE%3D&reserved=0 >> [3]: >> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fapache%2Fgeode%2Fcommit%2F07bf3dd827f29a5deb8619f79203d94847a1a823&data=02%7C01%7Cbakera%40vmware.com%7Cba2b7654573e4e0e88a808d7fd996183%7Cb39138ca3cee4b4aa4d6cd83d9dd62f0%7C0%7C0%7C637256707519827330&sdata=GLqL%2B%2Fs5Msna8sORi8Bh%2BMJQrPIn2lrnDO8%2F9OKNNy8%3D&reserved=0 >> >> -- >> Ju@N >
