On Fri, Nov 02, 2012 at 11:40:56AM -0400, Ehsan Akhgari wrote: > On 2012-11-02 12:12 AM, Nicholas Nethercote wrote: > >On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 6:33 PM, <therealbrendane...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >>The tyranny of hierarchy never ends. Either we have subsidiarity for js and > >>other modules, or not. If "Gecko" is one big module -- ok, I get it. But > >>you need a principle for giving js its own tests while hoisting all others. > > > >"Every component that can be distributed (built?) by itself gets its > >own tests/ directory"? Are there others apart from Gecko and > >SpiderMonkey? > > I don't think so! (Well, maybe mfbt...)
Indeed, mfbt is more or less standalone (and has make check tests) Third party code too (nspr and nss do come with their own tests, i don't know about others). Even some parts of gecko: Angle is standalone buildable, but i don't know if it has tests. The android linker is standalone buildable, currently doesn't have tests in the tree, but will. But they are make check kind of tests. Mike _______________________________________________ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
