On Tuesday, October 30, 2012 7:26:34 AM UTC-7, Henrik Skupin wrote: > As nearly all of you agreed on a flat folder structure makes a lot of > sense if only one type of test is present. I second that, and we > shouldn't make use of a 'tests' subfolder in such a case. But it would > be fantastic if we could agree on a reasonable naming schema. Something > we would propose is to use a folder name which matches the test > framework. Mostly we are doing it already but are affected by small > differences like 'mochitest' vs. 'mochitests'. The right usage would be > 'mochitest' and it would apply to the other frameworks too.
I didn't see anyone disagree with this, at least, just Karl's note that we might need separate names for the harness implementation and the test directories. What do people think? Is this OK? I would imagine that taking Karl's comment into account, it is, and if no one speaks up now, I would think you could just start submitting patches. > Further if more tests are getting created which span multiple test > frameworks, we should introduce the proposed 'tests' sub folder so all > the tests can be kept together. Existing tests would have to be moved > under tests, e.g. 'tests/mochitest' and 'tests/crashtest'. As far as I > have seen we are doing that already in a couple of components. I don't understand this piece very well. Do people understand this well enough to agree or disagree with it, and to do it if it's wanted? Dave _______________________________________________ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
