navina commented on PR #8564: URL: https://github.com/apache/pinot/pull/8564#issuecomment-1103253092
> Let's say a consuming segment is dropped (or reset), we will destroy the current consuming segment, and that will add a checkpoint to the source. The next consuming segment will skip the records within the dropped segment, and cause data loss. If you reset or drop a consuming segment, it is ok to destroy the consuming segment. It may cause a checkpoint at source. But your reset point should still pick up from where you actually "reset". Why would it skip the records within dropped segment ? I don't follow this part of your argument. Is it in the context of kafka like systems where the offsets are guaranteed to be simple monotonically increasing integers? Can you explain a bit? perhaps with kafka as a context? -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@pinot.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@pinot.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: commits-h...@pinot.apache.org
