https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22791
--- Comment #22 from Rafael Ávila de Espíndola <rafael.espindola at gmail dot com> --- (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #21) > (In reply to Rafael Ávila de Espíndola from comment #20) > > Note that while the assembler change is a nice improvement, the original > > issue still exists. > > > > In the testcase that I attached before, the call to foo is now assembled to > > R_X86_64_PLT32, but > > > > .long foo - . > > > > Still produces a R_X86_64_PC32 as it has to. > > > > Since foo has default visibility, the linker could create a canonical plt > > entry to be the runtime address of foo. > > Please open a separate bug for this. https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22842 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
