https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22791
--- Comment #21 from H.J. Lu <hjl.tools at gmail dot com> --- (In reply to Rafael Ávila de Espíndola from comment #20) > Note that while the assembler change is a nice improvement, the original > issue still exists. > > In the testcase that I attached before, the call to foo is now assembled to > R_X86_64_PLT32, but > > .long foo - . > > Still produces a R_X86_64_PC32 as it has to. > > Since foo has default visibility, the linker could create a canonical plt > entry to be the runtime address of foo. Please open a separate bug for this. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils