https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22791
--- Comment #17 from H.J. Lu <hjl.tools at gmail dot com> --- (In reply to Rafael Ávila de Espíndola from comment #16) > > > If your argument is that you can always treat PC32 relocations on branches > > > as if they were PLT32 relocations, why not just have the compiler emit > > > PLT32 > > > relocations in the first place? > > > > Yes, this patch does that: > > > > https://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2018-02/msg00074.html > > If I understand it correctly, the idea is to generate a R_X86_64_PLT32 for > "call foo" but a R_86_64_PC32 for ".long foo - .". If that is indeed what > the patch is doing, I love it :-) Yes, that is what patch does. My current patch is at https://github.com/hjl-tools/binutils-gdb/commit/80de23823c97db558436c9ad13d6728f43329706 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
