https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22791
--- Comment #16 from Rafael Ávila de Espíndola <rafael.espindola at gmail dot com> --- > > If your argument is that you can always treat PC32 relocations on branches > > as if they were PLT32 relocations, why not just have the compiler emit PLT32 > > relocations in the first place? > > Yes, this patch does that: > > https://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2018-02/msg00074.html If I understand it correctly, the idea is to generate a R_X86_64_PLT32 for "call foo" but a R_86_64_PC32 for ".long foo - .". If that is indeed what the patch is doing, I love it :-) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
