On 9 Nov 2010, at 16:25, Bart Cerneels wrote: > On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 16:50, Ian Monroe <i...@monroe.nu> wrote: >> I know some people are still using Gitorious repos and such for the >> ongoing work. However recently everyone has been granted the right to >> create branches on our git.kde.org/amarok.git repo. >> >> I think it would raise the visibility of feature branches if everyone >> just pushed them to the main repo. This would make things a bit >> 'messy', but I don't really think its a big problem. We could have a >> spring cleaning and move all the old branches into amarok-history if >> it becomes an issue. >> >> I do suggest that branches be named YYYYMMDD-description. >> >> Ian > > Regardless of name (which is to trivial to keep discussing) I suggest > to require the creation/push of a new branch is announced on this > mailing list. This keeps a log in a public archive with the reason for > the branch, a place to discuss and to get more contributors.
Makes sense to me. We shouldn't have such a huge number of branches that they clog up the mailing list anyway. --- Leo Franchi (512) 775 5637 lfran...@kde.org l...@kdab.com _______________________________________________ Amarok-devel mailing list Amarok-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/amarok-devel
