On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 9:21 PM, Bart Cerneels <bart.cerne...@kde.org> wrote: > On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 17:04, Ian Monroe <i...@monroe.nu> wrote: >> On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 9:57 AM, Leo Franchi <lfran...@kde.org> wrote: >>> On Tuesday, November 09, 2010 09:50:29 AM Ian Monroe wrote: >>>> I know some people are still using Gitorious repos and such for the >>>> ongoing work. However recently everyone has been granted the right to >>>> create branches on our git.kde.org/amarok.git repo. >>>> >>>> I think it would raise the visibility of feature branches if everyone >>>> just pushed them to the main repo. This would make things a bit >>>> 'messy', but I don't really think its a big problem. We could have a >>>> spring cleaning and move all the old branches into amarok-history if >>>> it becomes an issue. >>>> >>>> I do suggest that branches be named YYYYMMDD-description. >>> >>> +1 from me. Though I suggest for naming we could also do >>> >>> author-description >>> >>> instead. >> >> Yes, I think that naming scheme makes more sense. >> > > I don't agree since these kinds of branches are generally worked on by > multiple people. So having one "author" in the name is weird. I think > the date in the name makes more sense for spring cleaning purposes, > although it's not needed at all thanks to git's metadata.
Not that the author name matters a single bit... the important thing is that we can find these branches easily. The actual name won't appear anywhere in the final release. -- Mark Kretschmann Amarok Developer, Software Engineer at KO GmbH Fellow of the Free Software Foundation Europe http://amarok.kde.org - http://fsfe.org - http://kogmbh.com _______________________________________________ Amarok-devel mailing list Amarok-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/amarok-devel
