On Tuesday, November 09, 2010 09:50:29 AM Ian Monroe wrote: > I know some people are still using Gitorious repos and such for the > ongoing work. However recently everyone has been granted the right to > create branches on our git.kde.org/amarok.git repo. > > I think it would raise the visibility of feature branches if everyone > just pushed them to the main repo. This would make things a bit > 'messy', but I don't really think its a big problem. We could have a > spring cleaning and move all the old branches into amarok-history if > it becomes an issue. > > I do suggest that branches be named YYYYMMDD-description.
+1 from me. Though I suggest for naming we could also do author-description instead. cheers, leo -- l...@kdab.com KDAB (USA), LLC lfran...@kde.org The KDE Project _______________________________________________ Amarok-devel mailing list Amarok-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/amarok-devel
