On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 9:57 AM, Leo Franchi <lfran...@kde.org> wrote: > On Tuesday, November 09, 2010 09:50:29 AM Ian Monroe wrote: >> I know some people are still using Gitorious repos and such for the >> ongoing work. However recently everyone has been granted the right to >> create branches on our git.kde.org/amarok.git repo. >> >> I think it would raise the visibility of feature branches if everyone >> just pushed them to the main repo. This would make things a bit >> 'messy', but I don't really think its a big problem. We could have a >> spring cleaning and move all the old branches into amarok-history if >> it becomes an issue. >> >> I do suggest that branches be named YYYYMMDD-description. > > +1 from me. Though I suggest for naming we could also do > > author-description > > instead.
Yes, I think that naming scheme makes more sense. Ian _______________________________________________ Amarok-devel mailing list Amarok-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/amarok-devel
