On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 17:04, Ian Monroe <i...@monroe.nu> wrote: > On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 9:57 AM, Leo Franchi <lfran...@kde.org> wrote: >> On Tuesday, November 09, 2010 09:50:29 AM Ian Monroe wrote: >>> I know some people are still using Gitorious repos and such for the >>> ongoing work. However recently everyone has been granted the right to >>> create branches on our git.kde.org/amarok.git repo. >>> >>> I think it would raise the visibility of feature branches if everyone >>> just pushed them to the main repo. This would make things a bit >>> 'messy', but I don't really think its a big problem. We could have a >>> spring cleaning and move all the old branches into amarok-history if >>> it becomes an issue. >>> >>> I do suggest that branches be named YYYYMMDD-description. >> >> +1 from me. Though I suggest for naming we could also do >> >> author-description >> >> instead. > > Yes, I think that naming scheme makes more sense. >
I don't agree since these kinds of branches are generally worked on by multiple people. So having one "author" in the name is weird. I think the date in the name makes more sense for spring cleaning purposes, although it's not needed at all thanks to git's metadata. Bart _______________________________________________ Amarok-devel mailing list Amarok-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/amarok-devel
