On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 12:38 PM, Pekka Paalanen <[email protected]> wrote: > At least it does not require any protocol encoding/decoding or process > context switches, so it has potential to be at least as fast. Raster graphics system in Qt4 library is 6.5 times slower than native one on my PC with Intel graphics card and SNA enabled. Will Wayland provide same performance as Qt4 native graphics system?
qtperf4 -graphicssystem native QLineEdit - 0.022 s QComboBox - 0.19 s QComboBoxEntry - 0.183 s QSpinBox - 0.015 s QProgressBar - 0.021 s QPushButton - 0.016 s QCheckbox - 0.007 s QRadioButton - 0.019 s QTextEdit add text - 0.057 s QTextEdit scroll - 0.048 s QPainter lines - 12.95 s QPainter circles - 13.1 s QPainter text - 1.356 s QPainter pixmap - 0.088 s Total: 28.072001 s qtperf4 -graphicssystem raster QLineEdit - 0.043 s QComboBox - 0.336 s QComboBoxEntry - 0.327 s QSpinBox - 0.024 s QProgressBar - 0.04 s QPushButton - 0.017 s QCheckbox - 0.014 s QRadioButton - 0.035 s QTextEdit add text - 0.175 s QTextEdit scroll - 0.148 s QPainter lines - 86.218 s QPainter circles - 86.222 s QPainter text - 8.689 s QPainter pixmap - 0.867 s Total: 183.154999 s _______________________________________________ wayland-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/wayland-devel
