I've chosen tomahawk because of the clear and simple html output. if you want to render xhtml conform output (which means for example do not use tables for creating layout) with tomahawk there's a chance. ;-) Sure, you have to spend more time in css and styling but only in the beginning of the project and then (I think) you are more flexible.
Regards, Marcus 2011/6/8 Cédric Durmont <[email protected]> > Thanks Helmut, now I know a bit more about Tobago ;o) > Trinidad has some components for layout management (panelFormLayout, > panelGroupLayout, panelPage...), but you can't totally avoid html > layout with these (for instance you can't easily have a 2 column > layout, the first using 25% of available space, the seconf using 75%, > and a fixed size gutter between the 2) > > Regards, > Cedric > > 2011/6/8 Helmut Swaczinna <[email protected]>: > > Hi, > > > > I'm using Tobago now for years. (But I havn't used Trinidad.) The main > > advantage of Tobago is (to me) the buildin layout manager (gridlayout). > You > > havn't to deal with HTML table layout or something. With Tobago, you > don't > > need to use any HTML tag at all. Tobago has a rich skinning support too, > so > > you don't need to write any CSS class to get a quite good looking app. > > Buildin ajax support has Tobago also. > > > > Regards, > > Helmut > > > > Am 08.06.2011 10:53, schrieb Cédric Durmont: > >> > >> Hello, > >> > >> Can't tell about Tobago, which I don't use, but (to me) Trinidad has > >> the following advantages over Tomahawk : > >> - ajax support for all components > >> - popup management (passing values to popups and back...) > >> - skinning support > >> I use both Trinidad and Tomahawk in my current project, but Tomahawk > >> is only used for 1/ t:schedule, which has no equivalent component and > >> 2/ t:inputFileUpload (Trinidad has an upload component too, but I had > >> a hard time mixing Trinidad, Tomahawk and PrettyFaces, and now the > >> uploads are catched by Tomahawk. Better use one more Tomahawk > >> component than struggle with my web.xml again) > >> > >> Regards, > >> Cedric > >> > >> > >> 2011/6/7 Iratxe Lejarreta<[email protected]>: > >>> > >>> Hi, > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> I have to start a JSF project and I don't know what MyFaces component > >>> use: > >>> Tomahawk, Trinidad or Tobago. > >>> > >>> I have experience with Tomahawk and the result was good. > >>> > >>> I think with any of three I could do what I need, but I would like to > >>> know > >>> what are the differences with Trinidad and Tobago, and which is the > each > >>> maturity. > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> Thanks, > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> Iratxe Lejarreta > >>> > >>> www.axios.es > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > > >
