Hi,
I'm using Tobago now for years. (But I havn't used Trinidad.) The main advantage
of Tobago is (to me) the buildin layout manager (gridlayout). You havn't to deal
with HTML table layout or something. With Tobago, you don't need to use any HTML
tag at all. Tobago has a rich skinning support too, so you don't need to write
any CSS class to get a quite good looking app. Buildin ajax support has Tobago also.
Regards,
Helmut
Am 08.06.2011 10:53, schrieb Cédric Durmont:
Hello,
Can't tell about Tobago, which I don't use, but (to me) Trinidad has
the following advantages over Tomahawk :
- ajax support for all components
- popup management (passing values to popups and back...)
- skinning support
I use both Trinidad and Tomahawk in my current project, but Tomahawk
is only used for 1/ t:schedule, which has no equivalent component and
2/ t:inputFileUpload (Trinidad has an upload component too, but I had
a hard time mixing Trinidad, Tomahawk and PrettyFaces, and now the
uploads are catched by Tomahawk. Better use one more Tomahawk
component than struggle with my web.xml again)
Regards,
Cedric
2011/6/7 Iratxe Lejarreta<[email protected]>:
Hi,
I have to start a JSF project and I don't know what MyFaces component use:
Tomahawk, Trinidad or Tobago.
I have experience with Tomahawk and the result was good.
I think with any of three I could do what I need, but I would like to know
what are the differences with Trinidad and Tobago, and which is the each
maturity.
Thanks,
Iratxe Lejarreta
www.axios.es
