Hello, Can't tell about Tobago, which I don't use, but (to me) Trinidad has the following advantages over Tomahawk : - ajax support for all components - popup management (passing values to popups and back...) - skinning support I use both Trinidad and Tomahawk in my current project, but Tomahawk is only used for 1/ t:schedule, which has no equivalent component and 2/ t:inputFileUpload (Trinidad has an upload component too, but I had a hard time mixing Trinidad, Tomahawk and PrettyFaces, and now the uploads are catched by Tomahawk. Better use one more Tomahawk component than struggle with my web.xml again)
Regards, Cedric 2011/6/7 Iratxe Lejarreta <[email protected]>: > Hi, > > > > I have to start a JSF project and I don't know what MyFaces component use: > Tomahawk, Trinidad or Tobago. > > I have experience with Tomahawk and the result was good. > > I think with any of three I could do what I need, but I would like to know > what are the differences with Trinidad and Tobago, and which is the each > maturity. > > > > Thanks, > > > > Iratxe Lejarreta > > www.axios.es > > > > > > > >
