On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 07:39:22PM +0200, carlo von lynX wrote: > On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 12:48:38PM -0400, Paul Syverson wrote: > > Well there's things like alpha-mixing (better tau-mixing) as that > > Yes, alpha-mixing would be a great step forward I guess. > Would you say the things I wrote on http://secushare.org/anonymity > regarding not building future work on Tor are accurate? > I wouldn't like to be stating anything stupid in there. >
Not sure if accurate is an applicable notion here. I remain hopeful but dubious about anything that just assumes p2p automatically must be better for safety and privacy vs. client/server in the long run. One reason is discussed in section 2.4 of "Bridging and Fingerprinting: Epistemic Attacks on Route Selection" http://www.freehaven.net/anonbib/cache/danezis-pet2008.pdf For me this remains an open hard area that I continue to focus on. And people who know me will tell you that I always say, "Dare to be stupid." It's very hard to make any decent contributions if you are too afraid of looking dumb. aloha, Paul -- tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org To unsubscribe or change other settings go to https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
