> Jonathan Angliss wrote: > >> >> Not entirely possible. At least not with accurate results. Plus I >> think >> the hold up is in the processing of the THREAD results, and not the >> fetching of the message headers. The problem you're going to have is >> you're going to have to fetch the whole thread response to find out >> which >> block of 5000 you want to fetch. The second problem is, 5000 messages >> aren't necessarily going to be sequential numbers, so you cannot even >> guess a range. > > I think yes. So we know the whole number of messages. It is 20.000. > SM don't says SORT (ARRIVAL) ISO-8859-2 ALL, rather It says SORT > (ARRIVAL) ISO-8859-2 20000,19999,19998,19997..., ...,15000 > Nobody cares about the 13422th message. If user wants to access it, ok, > then say to get the second 5000 block, from 15000-10000 > > Remember: users don't want ot acces all of their emails stored on an > imap server. they use only the last message, however the option to acces > _quickly_ older messages is neccessary.
http://tools.ietf.org/wg/imapext/draft-ietf-imapext-thread/ We can do that only if IMAP provides such functions. -- Tomas ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642 -- squirrelmail-users mailing list Posting Guidelines: http://www.squirrelmail.org/wiki/MailingListPostingGuidelines List Address: squirrelmail-users@lists.sourceforge.net List Archives: http://news.gmane.org/thread.php?group=gmane.mail.squirrelmail.user List Archives: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id=2995 List Info: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/squirrelmail-users
