We do not know whether Solr will work for you. The only way to find out is to build it and try.
You already have a solution that works. Use that. wunder On Jun 25, 2013, at 10:28 AM, pradeep kumar wrote: > Solr is not a solution for my requirement? Please let me know > > Thanks > Pradeep > > > On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 10:52 PM, Shawn Heisey <s...@elyograg.org> wrote: > >> On 6/25/2013 9:19 AM, Walter Underwood wrote: >> >>> With only 10K records (lahks), a regular RDBMS should be just fine. I >>> don't see any need for Solr with a small dataset like that. >>> >>> Increase the caches sizes on your RDBMS so that all the tables fit in >>> memory. Even with 10Kbytes per record, that is only 100Mbytes of data. >>> >> >> Lakh is 100000 ... so 10 of them is one million. >> >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/**Lakh <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lakh> >> >> Thanks, >> Shawn >> >> -- Walter Underwood wun...@wunderwood.org
