Solr is not a solution for my requirement? Please let me know Thanks Pradeep
On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 10:52 PM, Shawn Heisey <s...@elyograg.org> wrote: > On 6/25/2013 9:19 AM, Walter Underwood wrote: > >> With only 10K records (lahks), a regular RDBMS should be just fine. I >> don't see any need for Solr with a small dataset like that. >> >> Increase the caches sizes on your RDBMS so that all the tables fit in >> memory. Even with 10Kbytes per record, that is only 100Mbytes of data. >> > > Lakh is 100000 ... so 10 of them is one million. > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/**Lakh <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lakh> > > Thanks, > Shawn > >
