Sorry, thinking of "man" from Japanese, which is 10K. Using language-specific numbers in an international forum is not a good idea.
wunder On Jun 25, 2013, at 10:22 AM, Shawn Heisey wrote: > On 6/25/2013 9:19 AM, Walter Underwood wrote: >> With only 10K records (lahks), a regular RDBMS should be just fine. I don't >> see any need for Solr with a small dataset like that. >> >> Increase the caches sizes on your RDBMS so that all the tables fit in >> memory. Even with 10Kbytes per record, that is only 100Mbytes of data. > > Lakh is 100000 ... so 10 of them is one million. > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lakh > > Thanks, > Shawn >
