On 6/25/2013 9:19 AM, Walter Underwood wrote:
With only 10K records (lahks), a regular RDBMS should be just fine. I don't see any need for Solr with a small dataset like that.Increase the caches sizes on your RDBMS so that all the tables fit in memory. Even with 10Kbytes per record, that is only 100Mbytes of data.
Lakh is 100000 ... so 10 of them is one million. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lakh Thanks, Shawn
