Thanks for the review Vignesh. The explanation you've provided of a
"desktop environment" is a bit over technical, but I think I understand
the concern you're raising and have added an introductory paragraph to
the -karmic branch to address this.
As for the other issue, the document now uses an ap
e left the term "unrestricted", because I
think it's clearer than "free", which is rather ambiguous as we all
know.
Let me know the approach you want to take so that this can be
consistent.
** Attachment added: "274845.diff"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/2483382
** Also affects: ubuntu-docs (Ubuntu Intrepid)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: ubuntu-docs (Ubuntu Intrepid)
Status: New => Triaged
** Changed in: ubuntu-docs (Ubuntu Intrepid)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Matthew East (mdke)
--
Documentation changed
** Changed in: ubuntu-docs (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Medium
** Changed in: ubuntu-docs (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
** Changed in: ubuntu-docs (Ubuntu)
Milestone: None => later
Assignee: (unassigned) => Matthew East (mdke)
--
restricted drivers descr
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 291253 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/291253
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 291253
ubuntu-artwork french locales still mention Hardy Heron on Intepid, when
starting firefox
--
intrepid ubuntu-docs contains hardy index-fr.html
https:
** Changed in: ubuntu-docs (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Mads Peter Rommedahl (lhademmor) => Matthew East (mdke)
--
F-Spot photo import instructions are incorrect on first use
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/209530
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which
Probably at the time the translations in 9.04.8 were exported, Swedish
translations for this template were not over the minimum 75% threshold
in order to be included.
If you don't see Swedish when the final translation export is done after
9 April, then please reopen the bug.
** Changed in: ubunt
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 356418
package gnome-user-guide 2.26.0+svn20090323ubuntu4 failed to
install/upgrade: subprocess post-installation script resulted with 139 code
--
package gnome-user-guide-en 2.26.0+svn20090323ubuntu4 failed to
install/upgrade: le sous-processus po
Yes, that's confirmed - from the build log for ubuntu-docs 9.04.8:
+ [ -e add-applications/po/sv.po ]
+ LANG=C msgfmt -o /dev/null --statistics add-applications/po/sv.po
+ cut -f1 -d
+ translated=70
+ echo 70./104 > 0.75
+ bc -l
+ [ 0 = 0 ]
+ echo add-applications sv is less than 75% translated,
** Also affects: ubuntu-docs (Ubuntu Intrepid)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: ubuntu-docs (Ubuntu Jaunty)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
Open LDAP - Incorrect Command
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/353487
You received this bug notification because y
** Project changed: ubuntu-website => kubuntu-website
--
Kubuntu website mistake
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/360214
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lis
** Package changed: ubuntu-docs (Ubuntu) => gnome-user-docs (Ubuntu)
** Changed in: gnome-user-docs (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Low
** Changed in: gnome-user-docs (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
** Bug watch added: GNOME Bug Tracker #578820
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug
Points 1-3 are not valid, because that section deals with the "Open
File" window, and not the nautilus window. The instructions are valid
for that window.
However point 4 is a valid one, because the instructions are not clear
that they apply only to using nautilus in "spatial mode". I've sent a
pa
** Changed in: ubuntu-docs (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Confirmed
--
OpenLDAP doc page is horrible
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/355400
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@l
This looks like a problem with the download. If you delete the
downloaded package (/var/cache/apt/archives/gnome-user-
guide_2.26.0+svn20090323ubuntu1_all.deb) and then try the upgrade again,
does it work?
** Changed in: gnome-user-docs (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Incomplete
--
package gnome-
The first problem is a duplicate of bug 303578. The second problem is
not an ubuntu-docs bug, so I'll open a task on the lsb-release package.
** Package changed: ubuntu-docs (Ubuntu) => lsb (Ubuntu)
--
Version not available in Jaunty
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/351068
You received this bug n
Bruce - can you explain a bit more about your suggestion?
Other packages (e.g. gnome-user-docs) use --disable-scrollkeeper in
debian/rules and still install their omf files in the appropriate way.
Why do you say that this will fix the problem? Have you tested this fix
and does it have any side eff
Sebastien's suggestion certainly fixes this bug - I've tested the fix.
I've created a debdiff but for some reason it is contaminated by the pot
file for the help. I'll attach it but would appreciate it if anyone can
tell me why that has happened.
** Attachment added: "debdiff"
http://launchpad
Looks like the pot file was there because the clean target failed to
clean it up after I built the binary package.
I'm attaching a revised debdiff which hopefully is good to go.
** Attachment added: "revised debdiff"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24562381/brasero_omf.debdiff
--
Brasero docum
ubuntu-main-sponsors subscribed
--
Brasero documentation does not appear in Yelp search results
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/264314
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.
I'd be grateful if someone experiencing this bug and running Jaunty
could try installing the attached deb file, and report on whether this
fixes the issue.
Thank you.
** Attachment added: "ubuntu-docs_9.04.6_all.deb"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24562564/ubuntu-docs_9.04.6_all.deb
--
System
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 255088 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/255088
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 263303
Ubuntu Help - Could not parse file
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 255088
About ubuntu fails to load
--
does not display about info
ht
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 255088 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/255088
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 255088
About ubuntu fails to load
--
Ubuntu Help - Could not parse file
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/263303
You received this bug notification because you
This is fixed in intrepid.
** Changed in: ubuntu-docs (Ubuntu)
Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released
--
In Yelp links dead
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/231367
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mai
Fix should be released in Intrepid, marking accordingly.
** Changed in: ubuntu-docs (Ubuntu)
Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released
--
broken link to gthumb documentation
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/222987
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, whic
We are getting so many duplicates of this bug that it's about time we
had an upload to intrepid with the fix.
Please could someone sponsor an upload from the branch here:
https://code.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-core-doc/ubuntu-doc/ubuntu-intrepid
The package builds directly out of the branch and will
Daniel - sorry for that, actually I'd added a whole new changelog entry
with those details and committed it, but unfortunately forgot to push
that to the launchpad branch. Whoops! I guess that changelog entry will
go into the archive with the next upload.
--
About ubuntu fails to load
https://bug
Ok, it's in the archive then, marking as released.
** Changed in: ubuntu-docs (Ubuntu)
Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released
--
Tech Review Report for installing.xml
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/224034
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
Ok, it's in the archive then, marking as released.
** Changed in: ubuntu-docs (Ubuntu)
Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released
--
Tech Report For migratingdata.xml
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/220049
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is sub
Ok, it's in the archive then, marking as released.
** Changed in: ubuntu-docs (Ubuntu)
Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released
--
Tech Review of dualboot.xml
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/219792
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribe
Hi,
It's been Ubuntu's policy for a long time to use release numbers and not
codenames (https://wiki.ubuntu.com/CodeNamesToVersionNumbers and
https://help.ubuntu.com/community/WikiGuide/WritingGuide)
Can you point out instances where codenames are used and they should not
be? If so, we can fix th
Confirming this.
** Changed in: ubuntu-docs (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
Community Docs - SaveError has occured in PageEditor.deletePage.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/410106
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubunt
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: ubuntu-docs
The documentation in the gnome-app-install package appears to have been
last updated in 2006. (06/29/2006: V 1.2)
We already ship decent documentation about installing packages with the
ubuntu-docs package in add-applications.xml. That is mor
Should also read "instant messaging".
** Changed in: ubuntu-docs (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
** Tags added: serverguide
** Tags added: bitesize
--
Typo instance
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/410654
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which
Hi,
How did you get to this search page? The correct search page is
https://help.ubuntu.com/search.html, and that appears to work correctly.
** Package changed: ubuntu => ubuntu-docs (Ubuntu)
** Changed in: ubuntu-docs (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Incomplete
** Changed in: ubuntu-docs (
Sam, I'm not 100% clear on the meaning of your comments, but I gather
that you aren't encountering the problem described by the bug report
anymore so I'm closing the bug.
--
Search in Ubuntu documentation doesn't work [converted from question]
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/303309
You received t
help.ubuntu.com/search.html should work fine without javascript enabled,
we implemented a workaround for that. I think your comment on the
separate bug in relation to javascript is about search.ubuntu.com, which
is a different website to that discussed on this bug.
--
Search in Ubuntu documentati
@David - I entirely agree with your comment as follows:
"This to me is a ubuntu wide branding problem though, having both the
version names such as 'Jaunty Jackalope' (which I just had to look up
since I didnt know it) and 9.04. Pretty confusing to new users when the
same product keeps getting ref
I've uploaded ubuntu-docs version 8.10.3 to the intrepid-proposed
repository for those running Ubuntu 8.10. Please could the ubuntu-sru
team (subscribed) approve the upload and announce here for testing.
slangasek noted in comment 7 that this is a candidate for an SRU but let
me know if you have an
I have uploaded a fixed package to intrepid-proposed; please follow up
for testing on bug 303578 once it is approved.
--
Documentation changed after latest Rosetta templates, update will be needed for
intrepid
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/288574
You received this bug notification because you
@mac_v and Alex: have you read the wiki page I linked in comment 23?
That is part of defined Ubuntu branding policy from as long ago as 2006
to eliminate the use of the development code name from any user visible
space.
--
"System->About Ubuntu" should more directly display version information
ht
Closing as per comment 5
** Changed in: ubuntu-docs (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Fix Released
--
Search in Ubuntu documentation doesn't work [converted from question]
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/303309
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which
Sam,
Obviously when we implemented the workaround for non-javascript users it
was tested. I've tested again now and I see that the workaround doesn't
work for help.ubuntu.com/search.html, but that it does work for the
other pages on help.ubuntu.com. Since search.html isn't really used as a
standal
lways been that the
codenames are for development use, and the version numbers are for
public visibility.
--
Matthew East
http://www.mdke.org
gnupg pub 1024D/0E6B06FF
--
"System->About Ubuntu" should more directly display version information
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/395905
Closing as per comment 1.
** Changed in: ubuntu-docs (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
--
W: GPG error: http://wine.budgetdedicated.com jaunty Release: The following
signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is not available:
NO_PUBKEY 58403026387EE263
https://bugs.launchpad.
** Tags added: packagingguide
--
HandsOn tutorial typo in dh_make
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/412194
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/m
** Tags added: packagingguide
--
pbuildir output is confusing, should be documented
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/412099
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://
I agree with Kenneth that adding a version number to the graphic is
undesirable. Most importantly, it's contrary to the usual branding
philosophy used in relation to the logo (i.e. that it should remain
unchanged except where there is a good reason to change it) - this is to
ensure consistency with
I've unsubscribed ~ubuntu-dev as requested.
--
package repositories are not properly working
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/409631
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
vhellmet - it's a good idea, and something like this was planned
(https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DesktopTeam/Specs/AboutThisComputer) but the
specification appears to have been abandoned:
"ted-gould, 2008-06-02: Made obsolete after discussions at UDS. Doesn't
currently match our desktop goals and QA is n
Dougie - could you upload the playbook pdf as an attachment to the wiki
page and we can link to it that way? I think it is more reliable.
** Changed in: ubuntu-docs (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
** Changed in: ubuntu-docs (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Dougie Richardson (dougi
** Changed in: ubuntu-docs
Status: New => Invalid
--
package ubuntu-docs 9.04.6 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess
post-installation script returned error exit status 2
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/353117
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, wh
** Tags added: serverguide
--
Misleading/Incorrect DNS configuration in the Ubuntu Server Docs regaurding DNS
setup/install
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/393649
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing l
** Tags added: serverguide
--
Update required in moin moin docs (Ubuntu-server 9.04)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/381802
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https:/
ocs (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Matthew East (mdke)
--
Help documentation not translated in French
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/389369
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubunt
Thanks for the report and the fix, Pete. I've committed this to our
repository and it will appear in Karmic in due course.
** Changed in: ubuntu-docs (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Committed
--
Ubuntu help reports incorrect properties of Firefox on a secure site
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bu
Hi Derek, thanks for the report. The manual for Gnome Power Manager is
provided by the gnome-power-manager package, so reallocating
accordingly. It would be very helpful if you could also report the bug
upstream at bugzilla.gnome.org, where the Gnome Power Manager developers
will see it.
** Packag
I think the correct url to use might be
http://kerneltraffic.osmirror.nl/ - but that page indicates that the
project is not being updated so it is probably safer to remove the link
entirely.
--
Online Installation Guide contains link to page with pornography
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/415108
Here is a patch on the bzr branch at ~ubuntu-core-dev/installation-
guide/ubuntu/.
I haven't updated the translations and probably it's a patch that is
best applied upstream if the bug exists there.
** Attachment added: "remove link to kernel traffic"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/30497718/pat
I've pushed an update to help.ubuntu.com to remove the link using the
patch in comment 4. That takes care of the website.
The fix should also be implemented in the installation-guide package.
** Also affects: ubuntu-docs (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: ubuntu-
** Tags added: serverguide
--
openldap server doc has incorrect steps
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/416539
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.c
** Tags added: serverguide
--
OpenLDAP doc page, schema config
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/416520
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mail
We can't easily implement either the suggestion to include whether
updates are available or whether the version is the most recent version
of Ubuntu or not, because those are both things that change during the
lifetime of an Ubuntu system and the help system that Ubuntu uses
doesn't allow us to plu
** Description changed:
Binary package hint: ubuntu-docs
- The wiki page for drbd [1] implies that the drbd module should already
+ The webpage for drbd [1] implies that the drbd module should already
exist, by not mentioning yet. Not all kernel images include it (such as
-virtual). Follo
** Tags added: serverguide
--
9.04 server documentation, Samba as a Domain Controller, says "security =
domain" by mistake
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/381918
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing li
** Package changed: ubuntu-docs (Ubuntu) => gnome-power-manager (Ubuntu)
--
gpm manual errors: 8.2 & 8.6
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/390488
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@list
** Changed in: ubuntu-docs (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Wishlist
--
Table format error on page 4 in 9.04 Ubuntu Server Guide in pdf format
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/390935
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
** Tags added: serverguide
--
Network configuration/bridging seems outdated
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/390578
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ub
you can try and suggest that the project use Launchpad as a bug
tracker, but that is ultimately down to the project's maintainer.
--
Matthew East
http://www.mdke.org
gnupg pub 1024D/0E6B06FF
--
packages.ubuntu.com is flakey recently
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/405904
You received this
This bug was fixed in ubuntu-docs 9.10.3 - please upgrade to that
version and reopen the bug if you still experience the issue.
I don't have a view about Chris' idea about shipping the desktop file in
the ubuntu-docs package, probably the gnome-panel maintainer is better
placed to comment on that.
Paul: I think Dan is right, the bug should be closed as Won't Fix. The
Community Council has discussed the issue and although I was in the
minority on the decision and wasn't happy with the process, the ultimate
decision is that the name stays and there is no possibility of it
staying. Out of respe
I've closed the Ubuntu task as per comments 100-102. I don't seem to
have permission to mark the ubunet task as "Won't Fix", but perhaps
someone else can take care of that.
** Changed in: ubuntu
Status: Confirmed => Won't Fix
--
"Ubuntu One" name creates confusion
https://bugs.launchpad.n
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 414287 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/414287
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 414287
links broken in help and support section
--
links broken in help and support section
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/414285
You received this bug noti
It's not obvious what has caused this error - it doesn't seem to be a
problem with the ubuntu-docs package.
Could you try running this command from a terminal and paste the output
here?
sudo dpkg -i /var/cache/apt/archives/ubuntu-docs_9.04.10_all.deb
** Changed in: ubuntu-docs (Ubuntu)
St
Well spotted, thanks. I've pushed a fix.
** Changed in: ubuntu-docs (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Committed
--
Typo in serverguide/windows-networking.xml
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/414605
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to
Fixed in ubuntu-docs 9.10.4
** Changed in: ubuntu-docs (Ubuntu)
Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released
--
9.04 server documentation, Samba as a Domain Controller, says "security =
domain" by mistake
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/381918
You received this bug notification because you are
Matt, thanks for looking after the implementation of this.
--
"Ubuntero" inappropriate for female contributors
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/272826
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bug
Perhaps all that is needed to fix this bug is to say:
"You are using Ubuntu 9.04 - the Jaunty Jackalope - released in April
2009."
Instead of:
"Thank you for your interest in Ubuntu 9.04 - the Jaunty Jackalope -
released in April 2009."
I personally don't think the existing phrase is unclear at
The Applications > Accessories > About Ubuntu link isn't provided by the
ubuntu-docs package - there must be something wrong with the Xubuntu
menu system if once ubuntu-docs is removed, the menu entry remains.
It's not a bug in ubuntu-docs or xubuntu-docs, but rather the XFCE menu
system.
** Chan
Not sure which package does this, so starting with xubuntu-default-
settings as a vague guess.
** Package changed: xubuntu-docs (Ubuntu) => xubuntu-default-settings
(Ubuntu)
--
[Xubuntu] yelp can not find ghelp:about-ubuntu
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/253416
You received this bug notificatio
** Tags added: serverguide
--
esulting hash value to the file /etc/grub/menu.lst
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/399288
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lis
Dougie - this fix doesn't appear to have been pushed to the karmic
branch.
** Changed in: ubuntu-docs (Ubuntu)
Status: Fix Committed => In Progress
--
Cups print sever page needs to be changed
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/401540
You received this bug notification because you are a memb
Released in ubuntu-docs version 9.10.3
** Changed in: ubuntu-docs (Ubuntu)
Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released
--
Missing word in ubuntu-docs "basic-commands" line 89
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/388651
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which
Released in ubuntu-docs version 9.10.2
** Changed in: ubuntu-docs (Ubuntu)
Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released
--
Rhythmbox has a tag editor musicvideophotos/c/music.xml line 58
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/371190
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Released in ubuntu-docs 9.10.2
** Changed in: ubuntu-docs (Ubuntu)
Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released
--
hubackup package has been removed from Jaunty repesitory
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/359256
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
** Changed in: ubuntu-docs (Ubuntu)
Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released
--
ubuntu server guide LVM
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/346826
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@l
** Changed in: ubuntu-docs (Ubuntu)
Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released
--
Typo in internet
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/357389
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ub
Released in ubuntu-docs version 9.10.2
** Changed in: ubuntu-docs (Ubuntu)
Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released
--
The section Listen to online audio streams is out-of-date and requires rework.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/187133
You received this bug notification because you are a me
** Changed in: ubuntu-docs (Ubuntu)
Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released
--
8.10 still reffered to as 'latest stable release' at help.ubuntu.com/8.10
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/375592
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to U
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 380836 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/380836
Ok, thanks Connor.
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 380836
jaunty cups documentation appears incorrect
--
Cups print sever page needs to be changed
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/401540
Yo
Thanks for the patch Shane. A few comments / questions:
You need to rework this sentence a bit: "Most video editors also support
video capture here are some". I'd suggest: "Most video editors also
support video capture. Examples are:"
I don't know whether it is possible to distinguish more betwee
Not a bug in ubuntu-docs, moving to firefox.
** Package changed: ubuntu-docs (Ubuntu) => firefox (Ubuntu)
--
computer seizes up when rearranging firefox bookmarks; tiny cloud (!?) appears
next to cursor.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/405102
You received this bug notification because you are a
Thanks for the bug. I think the comments from Ben and Graham are well
thought through and I'm going to close the bug - I don't think we should
change what a user sees depending on OS.
Matt
** Changed in: ubuntu-docs (Ubuntu)
Status: Unconfirmed => Rejected
** Changed in: ubuntu-website (u
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Duncan,
* Duncan Lithgow:
> This page contains documentation for Ubuntu 6.06 LTS (Dapper Drake).
> Find more documentation by clicking on the tabs at the top of this page.
> According to your browser you are probably looking for the Desktop Guide>
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: update-manager
The Ubuntu team have introduced another repository called dapper-
commercial. However it is not available as a "channel" in software-
properties. Please could you add this?
Matt
** Affects: update-manager (Ubuntu)
Importance: Untriag
It isn't sufficient because not everybody uses gnome-app-install.
This repository contains two commonly used applications (realplayer and
opera), and you are basically just saying: either use gnome-app-install
to install them or use the command line to play with the repositories.
This kind of "pa
I'm still not completely satisfied that we can close this bug. Matt, as
Thilo pointed out on the mailing list, on the point release spec it
says:
"The support team would like to have good traceability of the contents
of Dapper at its original release and at each point release.
The support team and
Thanks for this Matt: About Ubuntu and all the other ubuntu-specific
documents all get their version number from the same file, so changing
that will change it all.
The firefox homepage is separate from this scheme, so if you want to
leave that and upload new -docs packages with the change to Abou
Hi, webservers sometimes go down, and there was a problem with the
entire Ubuntu datacentre today. It seems to be fixed now.
** Changed in: ubuntu-website (upstream)
Status: Unconfirmed => Fix Released
--
help.ubuntu.com is down
https://launchpad.net/bugs/56199
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing li
I can't think of a way that the About Ubuntu document automatically
relies on lsb_release at the moment.
So, the changes I will do, based on what Matt has commented above are:
* Remove the version number from the firefox homepage and its translations
* Bump the version number in all of the docu
401 - 500 of 2012 matches
Mail list logo
